Archive for the ‘Teaching’ Category

h1

When Stage Lighting Gives You Lemons

October 19, 2011

StageLightExample-6447The way a stage looks in person and the way it looks in a photograph can be two very different things. My job in this case was to make the photos look as good (or better) as it looked to the audience. The client specifically wanted to make sure the background was colorful, not washed out. Unfortunately, however, the stage lighting was awful, so this was quite a challenge.

I ended up having to use two off-camera speedlights on either side of the stage to brighten up the speaker. Both flashes had a snoot on them to help aim the light and keep it from hitting the audience. I also had to make sure they wouldn’t spill light onto the background and wash out the green colored lights.

StageLightExample-6449This second images shows how it looked before I added my lights. Notice how much less detail you can see in his suit coat as well as the brightness of his skin.

It would have been much easier to shoot with the available light and then pass the blame, but a photographer’s job is to produce good photos with no excuses attached.

h1

Camera Bags for Event Photographers

July 31, 2011

When I show up to shoot an event with my 34 pound backpack plus light stands and belt pack I wonder whatever happened to the days when taking pictures meant heading  out with nothing but my camera. Now it takes me 10-12 minutes just to get setup for most shoots. The problem is that the more I learn about photography the more gear I want to get, which means there is more stuff I’ve got to schlep around with me. Eventually I outgrew my Jansport backpack that I had been using for just about everything since third grade. I remedied this by getting the ThinkTank Airport Antidote backpack which I’ve blogged about before.

While the backpack is perfect for carrying everything from my studio to another location and back, it’s completely impractical to use during a shoot. Personally I group photo bags into one of two categories: transporting or shooting. The backpack clearly falls under the first category where durability, space, and weight are primary concerns. For shooting however, I need a bag that is accessible, comfortable, and snug. You’ll notice “stylish” isn’t exactly on that list… Personally, I prefer the ThinkTank Pro Speed Belt.

The belt itself is just that. A belt. But when you trick it out with some modular pouches it becomes a fanny pack on steroids that will have all the ladies wanting you.

The beauty of it is that all of the weight you are used to carrying around your neck and shoulders is now spread around your hips. Everything is close to your body, so you can run at full speed without worrying about your stuff banging around. Everything is easily accessible –no more digging around in the abyss of your messenger bag for that memory card– and often times that can mean the difference between getting the shot or missing the moment. I’ve been using my belt for over two and a half years now, and I’d be hard pressed to come up with a better solution for event photographers. If you find yourself looking for a better way to consolidate and access your gear while shooting, I suggest you give the belt a try.

ProSpeedBelt-8771-Edit.jpgHere’s a look at my setup. Clicking on the image will take you to Flickr where you can see the notes explaining what’s in each pouch.

P.S. The belt is also great for hiking. I usually strip it down until it’s just the belt and camera holster. It protects the camera and makes it easily accessible. I recently climbed Old Rag with it and I had zero complaints.

*I’m not affiliated with ThinkTank Photo in any way. They simply make good products that make my job easier, so I’m happy to talk about them.

h1

Lessons Learned: Making Your Work Accessible

July 21, 2011

I’ve barely gotten any real work done today. I’ve spent most of my time sorting through hard drives and trying to locate photos. It’s annoying, but it’s been a good reminder of how important it is to make your work accessible not only to myself, but my clients (lesson 3 below). Here are a few things that make this easier…

Lesson One: Don’t delete your photos.  Today I’ve had three completely different clients say, “Hey, can you re-send the photos from ____?” They all have different reasons for needing them again, but the point remains the same. If I didn’t keep my photos long term then I’d have three disgruntled clients to deal with. It seems like a no brainer, but you’d be surprised how tempting it is to delete photos when you find that your hard drives are full. Which leads us to the next point…

Lesson Two: Establish an archiving solution. The important thing is that you have a system. Buying another external hard drive to “free up space” is not a system; it’s a symptom of a bigger problem. What you need is a plan. You need to know where to export your photos when you’re done with them, and you need to know how to find them years from now. I’ve blogged about my system before, but there are many different ways to do it. Find a solution that works best for you.

Lesson Three: Create online client galleries. This is where I’ve slacked off, and I’m paying the price for it today. Basically, you want a place where you can upload your finished, high resolution jpegs for the client to access on their own. I use Zenfolio, and I couldn’t be happier with it! I create a new group for each client, and then I add a new album for each shoot. This is ideal for corporate work where you’ll do multiple shoots for the same client, or destination weddings where you will have multiple days of shooting for a single wedding. The real advantage comes from the various options available such as privacy, expiration, and access control. This means my clients can locate their photos and download the high resolution images without having to wait for me.

Moral of the story, there is nothing sexy about file management. Do yourself a favor by making it as efficient and accessible as possible.

h1

Lessons Learned from Shooting a Chef

April 12, 2011

This is maybe the 4th or 5th time I’ve shot portraits of a chef, and I’ve really come to love it. I felt like I learned so much this time, and I’m excited to share it with you all.

Don’t tell him to smile. Give him a reason to smile. The difference is night and day.
AaronBaxendale-9205.jpg   AaronBaxendale-9211.jpg

For crying out loud pose your subjects before you start photographing them. Don’t just have them stand there assuming they know what to do. Tell them that it will probably feel awkward but look great on camera. Subtle changes can make a big difference.
AaronBaxendale-9160.jpg   AaronBaxendale-9178.jpg

During the first half of the shoot I used a three-point light setup. If your key light is too bright, your background light (aka rim light) will be lost. Notice the changes around his left temple. There needs to be enough room (on a brightness scale) to brighten the rim of your subject without blowing the highlights and losing detail. … Do what David Hobby does and set your key light last.
AaronBaxendale-2114.jpg   AaronBaxendale-2116.jpg

Hard key light combined with hard background light on opposite side of the subject produces a very stylized look. Using a fill light washes out most of that look.
AaronBaxendale-2154.jpg   AaronBaxendale-2153.jpg

Generally I don’t like tilted shots, but it might have helped to try some here to keep things from looking so rigid and stiff.
AaronBaxendale-9160.jpg

For the right chef the dramatic look of a key-only light setup might make for a really cool photo. …probably would work best with a softbox thought.
AaronBaxendale-9181.jpg

Sometimes you just have to say “Screw the three-point lighting” and just use natural window light. This way you don’t have to worry about creating the mood of the place, but you can simply capture it. This is especially helpful if you’re trying to showcase both the setting and the chef. A reflector nearby will bounce just the right amount of light back on your subject so that his face isn’t too shadowy.
AaronBaxendale-9185.jpg   AaronBaxendale-9186.jpg

As much as I don’t want to admit it, I am much better at working with natural light than I am at crafting light from scratch. Even an average window-lit shot from this shoot is way the heck better than any of the three-light shots. Sometimes you have to let go of your pride and preconceived notions and go with your gut. Both my client and I really wanted to nail a shot with the windows, water, and boats in the background, but as soon as we sat him down and shot parallel to the windows we knew we were onto something much better.

If your subject is wearing white (eg. chefs, brides, etc.), have them to turn their back to the light source. This will minimize the light it catches and you will have fewer blown-out highlights. Have them turn their face toward the light in order to light it properly –this is often a more pleasing pose anyway regardless of the light [see next comment]. All three of these photos had the exact same exposure settings, but the brightness in his shirt is quite different.
AaronBaxendale-9271.jpg   AaronBaxendale-9300.jpg   AaronBaxendale-9327.jpg

Angling his head in a different direction than his chest creates a much more dynamic pose.
AaronBaxendale-9346.jpg   AaronBaxendale-9347.jpg

If his face is still too dark, overexpose the white shirt by just a little bit –about 1/3 stop– then you can bring it down in post. Use the Graduated Filter to only darken the lower part of the image, not his face.
AaronBaxendale-9275.jpg   AaronBaxendale-9275-2.jpg (after)

As a general rule, window-lit portraits look fantastic in black and white.
AaronBaxendale-9278.jpg

I should have experimented with some gelled light to give the background more color. Shouldda wouldda couldda…
AaronBaxendale-2090.jpg

Learning from other people is great, and I highly encourage it; but until you learn something yourself it’s easy to forget (or not fully understand in the first place) what the other person was trying to teach you. For example, I feel like all of the stuff I’ve written here are things that Bambi Cantrell talked about in her recent Creative Live session, but I didn’t really get it until now. There is no learning method that can replace good ol’ fashion hard work.

h1

Suggestions for Buying a New Camera

April 8, 2011

It’s pretty much a safe bet. Whenever I get an email from a friend that I haven’t heard from in a long time there’s a good chance they are saving up to buy a new camera and they’re looking for some suggestions. So, here ya go…

Compact Cameras

Asking a professional photographer about compact cameras is about like asking Lance Armstrong which bike you should get from Wal-Mart. …well, maybe not quite that bad, but you get the idea. I don’t own a compact camera, but there is one that I would like –one that I would feel is a good enough replacement to an SLR. That’s the Canon G12. It gives you full manual control over your exposure and it can shoot in RAW. From what I’ve heard, it out-performs Nikon’s comparable camera even though the latter has better specs. Then again, at $500 you might just consider getting an entry-level SLR (more on that below).

Aside from the G12 I honestly don’t have any recommendations for compact cameras. At the rate that smart phones are going, we might find compact cameras to be a dying breed. Nevertheless, if you don’t want to break the bank and you want a pocket-sized camera consider the following guidelines.

  • Zoom – You’ll want a decent zoom, but make sure it’s an optical zoom; a digital zoom won’t do you a bit of good.
  • Battery Life – I wouldn’t recommend buying a camera that runs on double A batteries; instead look for one that uses a custom lithium battery or something like that.  They’ll last longer and cost less in the long run.
  • Shutter Delay -    The shutter delay information may or may not be readily available, but basically it’s a measure of how quickly the picture is taken once the button is pressed –this can mean the difference between getting the shot you wanted as opposed to missing the action.
  • Megapixels – don’t worry about them. We are slowly coming out of the age where all cameras are measured by the number of megapixels they have, but that simply is not any way to determine a camera’s image quality. I’ve got a 20″x30″ print that was taken with a 6 MP camera; had I not told you that you never would have known by looking at it.

SLR Cameras

Despite my preference for the G12, I’m a huge fan of Nikon. Thus my suggestions will be a bit biased entirely in favor of Nikon. Canon makes great cameras too, but in my opinion everything about them feels backwards. I would also go so far as to say that Nikon has really developed an edge over Canon in the last two years as they focus on better image quality and fewer megapixels. Personally I prefer the color tones of Nikon; they just have a richer feel if you ask me.

The good news is that buying an SLR is fairly straightforward; the more you spend, the better the camera you get. Let your budget determine the camera, but be sure to leave room for a lens, memory cards, batteries, and maybe a flash if you’re feeling adventurous. There is no reason to go into debt buying a camera unless you are confident that you can make money with it –and if you can do that, you probably already have a good camera.

I don’t mean to be Johnny Raincloud here, but this needs to be said: Don’t confuse need for desire. You will always want a better camera. If you have a camera already (particularly an “old DSLR” –which is somewhat laughable to put those to words together) ask yourself how much you are using it. Chances are that the camera still takes great pictures, but you don’t use it like you could. Getting a new camera will generate some enthusiasm for a little while, but unless you make a point to get out and take pictures often you’ll be no better off with a fancier camera.

Once you narrow it down to a couple choices find a way to get your hands on each camera and play with them for as long as you can. Borrow one from a friend, or at least test out the model at a local camera shop. Chances are pretty good that one will feel more intuitive and comfortable than the other. After budget, I would say that this is the most important factor in your choice. If you don’t feel comfortable using your camera you will likely get frustrated and not take as many pictures or you’ll just keep it on Auto and never use all the features you paid for.

Don’t overlook the option of shopping for used cameras. You could buy a decent camera used, play with it for a year or so, and then sell it again putting that money toward a better camera. It requires more work and more time searching, but it’s the most cost effective option in the long run. Just make sure to do your homework and only buy a used camera if you feel completely good about it. Aside from physical damage I would say the most important thing to check is the number of actuations (ie. shutter clicks) when buying used. If the seller doesn’t know the number or doesn’t know how to find out (hint: check out Opanda or Exif Viewer) then it’s probably not worth buying from them.

As for lenses, some of them may come with a “kit” lens, which is usually the 18-55mm. It’s a decent little lens, but not spectacular by any means. If you’ve got the room in your budget, I would suggest going for the 18-105mm lens, or even the 18-200mm VR2.

Don’t forget to add a memory card. You probably don’t need to spend the extra money on a super fast card at this point. Also, you’d probably be fine without an extra battery –all of Nikon’s cameras should be able to get at least 1,000 shots on a single charge, probably more.

Hopefully that helps! Feel free to share with the rest of us if you have any tips from your own search.

h1

Setting Up a Home Photography Studio

April 7, 2011

I’ve been using my living room as a make-shift photo studio for about 6 months now. It has served me well for the most part, but I’ve decided to kick it up a notch, turn it into a studio rather than a living room. I still have some work to do before it’s fully functional, but I thought I’d share the process with you so far.

First is the (hopefully) obvious stuff:

  • Decide what type of work you want to be doing in the studio and plan accordingly.
  • Consider your light source –north facing windows are ideal because they never receive direct sunlight.
  • Measure everything. You’ll save yourself a lot of trouble if you know exactly how much space you have to work with.

The two most important things for me are 1.) having an open, adaptable space to do creative portraits and personal projects, and 2.) being able to precisely control the light.

Before studio paint The first goal is a combination of several smaller decisions which I will highlight in Part 2 once I actually finish them (ie. the next time I’m procrastinating). For now I want to focus on my second objective. To properly control the light you’ve got to minimize bounced light. Shooting in a small space with white walls makes it nearly impossible to isolate your light because white is so reflective even if it’s a matte paint. The best way to get around this is to darken things down.

Take a photographer’s Color Checker to Home Depot and tell them you want middle gray in flat paint. Don’t get confused by the term “18% gray” which is often used in reference to metering and exposure. The percentage refers to the reflectivity of the material, not the brightness. In other words, there is also 18% black and 18% white and 18% green, etc… You don’t want your walls to be reflective at all; they are much easier to work with if they are completely flat. The important thing is to get a medium gray color. I opted for a shade halfway between black and white. It’s light enough for a livable space, but it’s also dark enough to soak up most of the light.

LarryDriver-6542Avoid any color in your paint. If you have a green wall, for example, any light that hits it will bounce back as a green color. It may be cool for a shot or two, but it will annoy the crap out of you in short order. If you need color, you can add a gel to your flash. The whole point of creating a neutral (gray) space is that you can make it whatever you want. Also, the darker walls will respond better to color gels than a white wall. In other words, if you’re trying to create, say, a blue background it’s much easier to do this by pointing your blue-gelled flash at a gray wall than a white one. White walls tend to make colors more pastel.

I only used one coat of paint. Even though it seems good enough I can see advantages of having a second coat, mostly because I would’ve been less stingy with the paint and had fewer visible strokes. Then again, I can always re-paint later.

I left the ceiling white. Some people suggest painting it black for a photo studio but personally I like having the option to bounce my lights off the ceiling for a large overhead light source that doesn’t take up any space overhead. Secondly, I don’t want my clients to think I’m some goth emo freak who lives in a cave with a black ceiling. You’ve got to consider the psychology of the space as well as the efficiency of it.

It took me a while to make up my mind about which walls I would paint. Should I leave one white? Maybe paint one black? Eventually I realized that it would be best to paint everything gray and use the backdrops to change things up as needed. My setup allows me to cover two walls with backdrops (more about that in Part 2). If I want a pure white background I simply use my giant white paper roll. If I want black I can underexpose the gray walls until they appear black in the photo or just use a black paper roll. In the end it’s much easier to have a neutral space that can be changed quickly and easily.

After studio paint

All of this cost me less than $40. One can of Behr Premium Ultra gray paint put me back $32. One roll of 2″ painters tape was another $6. I was able to borrow painting tools from my brother who recently finished painting his own studio. Chances are pretty good that one of your friends has some painting supplies you could borrow too.

Check back for Part 2 of this post for tips on finishing your home photography studio on a budget.

h1

Backpack and Gear for Event Photographers

April 5, 2011

If I had a nickle for every time I’ve been asked about my equipment…

So, the purpose of this post is first to answer the question of what I use and secondly to serve as a guide so that my assistants know exactly how to make everything fit inside the backpack. I’ve tried many many variations and this one seems to work the best for me. When the backpack is fully loaded it weighs about 34 pounds, and it is designed to fit perfectly under any airplane seat. Be sure to view the image on Flickr to see the notes describing everything.

Backpack and Gear

The backpack itself is made by ThinkTank Photo, and I’m a huge fan of their stuff. They make top quality gear for just about everything a photographer could need. I use their Pro Speed Belt system while I’m shooting, and it has made my job so much easier. Maybe that’s worth a post of its own…

h1

Lessons Learned: Shooting a Fashion Show

April 1, 2011

I had the joy and privilege of shooting a week long fashion show called Crystal Couture earlier this year. Given that I’ve never shot fashion it was a big learning experience for me. Fortunately my client wanted a lot of “event photos” too, so I didn’t feel completely outside my element. I shot photos for four hours every night then I sorted, edited, and uploaded all the photos by 10 AM the next day.

Every night I made notes of the things I learned that day and hoped to do differently the next. I’ve copied those notes below and added some of the photos to illustrate what I’m talking about. Most of the text here was written for personal use rather than public consumption. I feel like it loses a bit of flavor every time I try to rewrite it, so this post is still a little gooey in the middle. If you have questions don’t hesitate to hit up the comments section below and I’ll clarify as best I can.

The lighting for runway fashion is very different (in a good way) than shooting events. I was able to get some surprisingly good photos with minimal effort because the lights were already set to make the girls look good. This should be true of any respectable fashion show. No additional lights/flashes were used for these two shots, but I did make sure my White Balance was set to Tungsten/Incandescent to match the color temperature of the runways lights.
CrystalCouture-8421 CrystalCouture-8562

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Lessons Learned: Jenny and Ben’s Engagement

March 30, 2011

I’ve said it many times before and I will say it again: I learn so much more while editing my own photos than I do while shooting them. During a shoot I have way too many things on my mind and I never have all the time I want. My thought process changes entirely when I put down the camera and reach for my mouse. Below are some of the things I noticed and learned while editing Jenny and Ben’s engagement photos.

For couples, have the dude put his arm around her back underneath her arm. It’s far more intimate than if he puts his hand on the outside of her arm. The former is how I might pose with my girlfriend, but the latter is how I pose with my sisters.

JennyBen-8174-2   JennyBen-7637

It’s amazing how much difference a simple camera angle can make. In the first image the bright background draws too much attention to the pedestrian. By shifting my angle slightly I am able to hide the white wall, show more of the glass background and less of the floor, and I didn’t cut off Ben’s knee this time. Also note that a person in the background doesn’t pull your attention as much if you can’t see their face.

JennyBen-7955 JennyBen-7957

Use telephoto compression (more about this in a later post) to exaggerate the size of something in the background. Note that Jenny and Ben did not move between shots –count the floor tiles if you don’t believe me. The only difference is that I backed up and zoomed in.

JennyBen-8112 JennyBen-8113

When using an external light source/flash around sunset, place the light 180 degrees from the sun so that your subject is sandwiched between the two. The external light will function more like a reflector rather than an obvious catchlight. This produces much more flattering results. Note the harsh shadows on their faces when I put the flash to the right of my camera.

JennyBen-8177 JennyBen-8179

“One-handed” half dip kiss is a really sexy pose. Her right hand around his neck, left hand hangs freely. I should use this pose more often.

JennyBen-8216

Don’t always assume that f/2.8 is the best aperture. Sometimes it’s better to stop it down so you can get a little more depth; bring the background into focus a little more. This image was shot at f/2.8, but I have a feeling that I would like it better if I shot it at f/5.6.

JennyBen-8255

Having the dude sit facing forward instead of sideways is a great solution to the cheesy, gay back-to-back pose.

JennyBen-8357

When doing a lower body shot make sure they are holding hands. It creates a stronger connection between them.

JennyBen-8077

I missed an opportunity for a cool shot here. Next time I’ll try a profile shot of him kissing her hand, but he should be kissing her left hand with the ring on it. Try a close-up one with his eyes closed, and maybe a medium shot with him looking at her while kissing her hand.

JennyBen-7804

h1

Lightroom Tutorial: Making Headshots Pop

March 23, 2011

HeadshotEditing

This tutorial uses the following tools and settings to make the adjustments seen above:

White Balance, Contrast, Blacks, Spot Removal, Adjustment Brush, and Sharpening.

Feel free to leave any questions in the comments section below. I realize there are some issues with the audio (compression “hiccups” and sync) but considering that this is my first video tutorial I’m gonna let it slide.

h1

8 Reasons Why You Should be Scouting Locations

August 17, 2009

I’ve been a full-time “professional” photographer for three years, but I’m just now discovering the inherent value of scouting your location before a shoot.  Even if it’s a place you’ve been to a dozen times before, go scope out the location again.  Here’s why…  (BTW, I’m referring to “location scouting” in the sense that the spot has already been determined, not “location choosing.”)

It will help you know what gear you will need to rent/bring. It’s frustrating to be in the middle of a shoot thinking, “If only I rented a 400mm lens,” or worse when it’s the opposite, “I wish I didn’t waste $45 bucks renting an extra Quantum battery for this.”

You will know your way around the place better. Familiarity lends itself to confidence.  You never know if the client will ask you how to get back to the parking lot, and you will be in much better standing with them if you can help with these seemingly small things.  The little things can make a huge difference.

It forces you to be intentional about planning and making your shots. Often times this is a key difference between a photographer and a painter.  We photographers show up and take a lot of photos, but rarely do we make photos.

It helps you view familiar places in a new light. Think of the space and how your client will be using it.  What do they want to capture, and what is the best way to capture it?  Build from your past experiences, but seize the opportunity to look for new perspectives.  “What if we got a ladder in here?…”  “Can these lights be controlled?…”

Your client will appreciate the effort and preparation you put forth. Most clients like to think that their event is somehow different than anything that’s been done before, so not only will you instill confidence in them but you will also appear more professional.  Invite them to come along and offer their ideas as well; include them in the creative planning process.

It will get you out of the reactive mode that many photographers get stuck in. We show up just before the shoot, take a look around, and then say, “Well, I guess this means we’re gonna do this… [insert the same approach you use for everything.]“  Location scouting gets you thinking proactively about your work.

It gives you more time to solve problems. Every location has at least one thing about it that’s tricky to deal with –it’s usually the lighting, but it could just as well be the client’s expectations.  If you wait until the shoot has begun before looking for a solution then you might be too late.

It enables you to imagine possibilities rather than see obstacles. Allow yourself to dream big!  Start with a crazy idea, and then run through the logistics of how to pull it off.  Eventually you will find yourself saying “What if…” instead of “if only…”

I’ll be the first to admit that I’ve told many clients that “I don’t need to scout the location before the event because I come prepared for everything, so I’ll be fine.”  That’s bull crap.  “Prepared for everything,” HA!  This comes from an amateur mindset that thinks the only thing you need is a 24-70 f/2.8 lens and a hot shoe flash.  Yeah, good luck trying to recreate this shot with that setup.

If I didn’t scout the Newseum or the NanaWall locations before those shoots, I would have come away with nothing but garbage.  Both of those shoots kicked my butt, yet they now represent some of my happiest, most impressed clients.  I hope you’re noticing the trend here…  Pre-production (eg. location scouting) + hard work = great photos and happy clients.

Try it yourself and see if it doesn’t change the way you think about your work.

h1

A shooting at the Newseum

June 26, 2009

No, not that kind of shooting.  Just the photo kind.

Last week I shot a two-day conference at the Freedom Forum; it’s essentially the conference center of the Newseum.  I went on a site visit about a month earlier (to see what it would be like to shoot in there), and I came away with a lump in the back of my throat.  Three of the four walls were glass and two-thirds of the ceiling was black.  Oh! and the event was scheduled to run from 8AM – 4PM.  Perfect.

Anybody who has taken very many pictures knows that these high-contrast situations are not fun to deal with. Nevertheless, I agreed to shoot the event, and I was determined to do my best.  After all, I had just written a post about doing something that makes you feel anxious, and this was a frickin’ case study!

-Lessons Learned-

This event was a BIG learning experience for me.  I hope there are others who can benefit from this, whether you’re asked to take pictures at the Newseum or some place similar.  Here’s what worked for me.

Additional lighting is mandatory. Hot shoe flashes simply don’t have enough firepower to fill a room like this.  The above photo was taken with a full power flash bounced off the ceiling.  As you can see, there is almost no detail in the foreground.  I rented two Elinchrom 600Ws monoblocs, and they seemed to be just right.  I considered the 400Ws blocs, but I’m glad I decided to stick with the 600.

Light placement should be carefully considered. Not only do you want to minimize reflections, but more importantly you need to think about how you will sculpt your subject with the light.  It’s not good enough to simply have an evenly exposed image; the light needs to tell a story or at least direct the viewers eye.  Check out my first lighting tutorial to see what I mean about sculpting with light.

You must plan and wait for your shots. I had to decide what I was going to shoot, adjust the lights, and then wait for the right moment.  The direction of my lights determined where I could point my camera.  I couldn’t photograph the speaker and then turnaround and shoot the audience right away.  It’s an interesting combination between event and studio photography.

Monoblocs are bright! REALLY bright.  That’s what I was most concerned about.  I was afraid I would be too distracting even though I warned the organizers about the difficulties of shooting there.  On day two they asked me if I could tone them down, so we met with a compromise: I only used the flashes a few times at the beginning of each person’s speech.  I had already taken a ton of audience shots the day before, so I was not at risk of missing much.

It’s helpful to think of your lights as a Key light and a Fill light.  Differ the intensities of them to avoid even illumination on both sides of your subject.

Use a hot shoe flash (bouncing off the ceiling) if you need to add a little more light to the foreground closest to you.  You can still connect the PocketWizards via the camera’s PC terminal.  This is especially helpful for shots like this one where I wanted to illuminate an audience member and the speaker simultaneously.

I recommend that you soften the light with an umbrella. The light will get harder with distance, but I still prefer the look of a bounce umbrella at 50 feet away in this case.

Crank up the flashes to overpower the tungsten lights of the room, otherwise you’ll have an ugly mix of three different light colors.  I didn’t have any gels for the monoblocs, so I didn’t have much choice over White Balance.  However, by minimizing the effects of the interior lights then I was only battling the colors from two light sources instead of three.  The blocs and the outside light are reasonably close in color temperature, so that made things a tad easier.

-Workflow-

First step was to control the ambient light. If you haven’t already guessed, this means I was shooting in Manual.  I used PocketWizards (Plus IIs) to trigger my lights, therefore my shutter speed couldn’t be any faster than 1/250.  An aperture of 5.6 and an ISO of 100 proved sufficient most of the day.  …and by “sufficient” I mean that the sky was bright but it still had some blue in it.

Now that the camera was set, the only thing left to control was the lights.  I adjusted their power and position several times before finding a sweet spot (illustrated below). Even then I would have to reposition them depending on whom/what I was shooting.

The monoblocs require a power outlet, so their mobility is limited.  Fortunately there is no shortage of outlets at the Newseum.  Just be mindful of your extension cords if you need to put your lights near a walkway.  Have some gaffer’s tape handy.

Personally, it took me about an hour and a half before I found a rhythm and started feeling good about the pictures I was shooting.  Most of that first hour and a half was just trial and error. There was a lot of new stuff to familiarize myself with, but once I did I was able to get creative and do my job well.

-At the end of the day…

I’m thrilled with the way the photos turned out!  The Newseum is the most technically challenging location I’ve shot in yet, but I’m very pleased with the end result.  It makes me want to do more off-camera lighting for events.

Also, I really enjoyed working with a different color palette, so to speak.  Most of the events I’ve shot are rich with warm tones, but the glass and daylight at the Newseum naturally shifted the colors to a greenish blue cast.  It’s a very welcomed change for me.

Perhaps most importantly is the fact that my client was impressed.  One of the organizers said, “These are the best photos we’ve ever had at any of our conferences.”  Coming from someone who plans conferences for a living, that comment sure made my day!  =)

Feel free to share your experiences here, particularly if you’ve worked at the Newseum.  I think all of us DC photographers will be better off for it.

h1

DIY Business Cards [tutorial]

January 29, 2009

No doubt there are dozens of ways to make business cards. I choose to design and create them myself, and I know many other people who do as well. Recently I designed new cards for SE.com, and it occurred to me that I could considerably speed up the process by putting all the tedious parts into a Photoshop Action.

SE_BizCards02

After designing a single card, I then duplicate and arrange it on an 8.5 X 11 sheet of paper. I’ve found that if you arrange them all end-to-end you can maximize the space and get 12 cards from a single sheet as seen below.

SE_BizCards02Sheet

So, what I’ve done is compile all the boring, non-design stuff into an Action that anybody can use. It’s designed to save time and let one concentrate solely on the design. Here’s how to use it.*

Steps

  1. First of all, you will need to download the Action here. I suggest saving it in the program folder for Photoshop, but that’s up to you.
  2. From here, you need to import the Action into Photoshop. To do so, bring up the Actions palette (ALT + F9) and click on the triangle in the top right corner to open the pop-out menu. Then click on “Load Actions.”
  3. Navigate to the file you just downloaded; select it, and hit “Load.”
  4. ActionsPalette

  5. You should now have a new folder in your Actions palette called BusinessCards.atn Within that folder are two separate actions. One is titled “Biz Card Single” and the other “Biz Card Sheet.”
  6. Click the Action called “Biz Card Single” and then click the play button at the bottom of the Actions palette. This will create a new canvas and end with a message prompt. Simply follow the instructions, and then play the “Biz Card Sheet” action when you have finished and flattened your design.
  7. BizActionMsg

Notes:
If you desire to create a vertical business card, rather than a horizontal one, go ahead and rotate the single card (Image > Rotate Canvas) and design until your heart’s content. However, for the Action to work, you must rotate the card back to the horizontal position before playing the “Biz Card Sheet” Action.

This Action is designed to make standard-sized business cards (2″ X 3.5″).  Other dimensions will not work using this layout.

Don’t forget to save the single card as a .psd before you flatten it! You wouldn’t want to lose your layered version of the file.

Print the cards on heavyweight card stock. I prefer the look of matte card stock, but you might like glossy better. That’s up to you.

The cards are lined up end-to-end which means two things: 1.) There is no bleed boundary on the single card canvas.   2.) You will have to cut the cards yourself.  Depending on your design, you might have to be extremely accurate with your cuts.  I definitely recommend a paper cutter.

Personally, I save the sheet as a .pdf and then take it to Kinko’s to have them print it on matte card stock.  Save yourself a headache, and print a test copy on your own printer first.

You can also use this to print something on the backside as well.  If you follow the same steps above you can be certain that your sheets will have the exact same alignment.  Printer discrepancy is a different story altogether…

*Though the Action is intended to save time, it cannot design the card for you. This tutorial assumes moderate proficiency with Photoshop.

h1

On-Site Printing [tutorial]

September 13, 2008

As I mentioned in an earlier post I had two clients ask if I could print photos on-site so that the attendees would have something to take home, kinda like a party favor.  I did some research and found it to be more affordable than I initially thought.  So, I ordered a couple printers and decided to give it a shot.  So far I’ve had two opportunities to put this system to use, and I’ve had great success with it both times.  This tutorial describes my setup, workflow, and what I’ve learned along the way.

Background Info:
I needed a printer that could deliver photo-quality prints quickly and affordably.  My research immediately pointed me to dye sublimation printers.  They use an altogether different technology than inkjet or laser printers.  As far as I can tell, it’s the same technology they use in the self-service photo printers at CVS, Wal-Mart, Kinko’s etc.  Additionally, I needed something that could print straight from a memory card and from a computer.

Blasphemy!

I landed on the Selphy CP760 by Canon.  It’s a compact photo printer, it met my requirements, and it’s only a hundred bucks.  I knew I would have a pretty demanding output volume, certainly higher than the average consumer, so I ordered two of them.

So, with the addition of my printers here’s a look at the key components of my setup:

  • Two Cameras: Nikon D300 and Minolta Maxxum 7D
  • Two printers and enough ink and paper for over 500 prints
  • Five memory cards
  • One MacBook and memory card reader
  • Adobe Lightroom

Given that I had never used a printer like this before, I did a few test shots and test prints to see how everything flowed.  The printer is super simple to use.  Pop in a memory card, the images show up on the small playback screen, tell it how many copies you want of each, and then hit print.  The quality is exactly what I needed to.

PrinterAndPrints-4321

The Setup:
First of all, set your camera to shoot “RAW + Jpeg.”  Most printers cannot read RAW files.  Lightroom, on the other hand, works better with RAW files, so be sure that the option to “Treat jpeg files next to raw files as separate photos” is unchecked in the Import Preferences dialog box in Lightroom.

LR_prefs

Another invaluable asset is the DPOF option in most digital cameras. Digital Print Order Format allows you to setup a run sheet for the printer. Within the camera you make note of which pictures to print and how many. That information is then saved to the memory card and read by the printer. The printer then says, “Hey, I see that there is a print order file on here, do you want me to print these?” (paraphrased, mind you). Simply hit the print button and you’re in business.  Check your camera’s instruction manual for information about DPOF.

Next, you’ll want to install the printer on your computer so you can print directly from Lightroom. Fortunately I had no problems with this whatsoever. I installed it first on my PC at home, and then on a MacBook for the events. The printer ships with a CD-ROM that includes drivers for both operating systems, so you can be up and running in no time. The most important thing to keep in mind is that you will have to setup the printer preferences in Lightroom so that it will print properly on the 4×6 postcard size paper.

Printing from a computer provides some advantages that you can’t obtain by printing from the memory card, but it also contains some disadvantages. Here’s a look at them.

Pros:

  • You can print edited photos.
  • It’s easier to find a specific photo.
  • You can print your logo or website on photos,

Cons:

  • The photos must be imported and exported before printing starts (ie. it’s more time consuming).
  • You can only use one printer unless you have a second computer.

Whether you decide to print mainly from the computer or memory cards will largely be determined by your equipment setup. In either case I suggest you follow this principle: Use the DPOF for what it does best –printing pictures quickly.  Use the computer for what it does best –printing edited pictures and printing photos per request.

General Workflow: Set DPOF as you’re shooting and then print on the standalone printer first. After the photos have been printed, upload them to the computer. Review the photos and note any ones that need to be edited and re-printed, or any ones that will likely need extra copies. Add those photos to the Quick Collection in Lightroom. If you need to start another batch while the standalone printer is busy, then go ahead and print DPOF from the second printer. Try not to let the re-prints sit in Lightroom too long before they are printed.  Clear the DPOF info from the memory card next time you insert it in the camera, otherwise you’ll end up printing multiple copies of the same photos.

Lightroom Workflow: Import the RAW photos directly from the memory card. In other words, don’t copy them as DNG files; doing so will only slow down your pipeline. Remember, speed is paramount when printing on-site. Add to the Quick Collection* any photos that need to be edited or have extra copies made. The QC then serves as your printer queue. View the QC and edit the photos as necessary; create virtual copies for any photos that need additional prints. Then switch to the Print Module, select all the photos and click print.

*Simply select a photo and press “b” to add it to the QC.

Adapt your workflow to your setup and your delivery requirements. There is no “one size fits all” approach to printing on-site. Prior to the shoot, gather as much information about the event as you can, and then use that information to decide the best way to handle things.

The decision to hire an assistant is based largely on the nature of the event. As a general rule, if the client is okay with you devoting 1/3 of your time to making prints, and therefore only 2/3 of your time taking photographs, then you can handle the printing yourself. If the client requires that you are available to take photos the entire time, then you’ll need an assistant. You’ll need to charge more if you hire an assistant, so make sure you give the client an overt benefit for having one –more prints, faster, and more coverage.

Ideas for Newbies:
Test your ISO settings on the printer.  Shoot a series of photos in a darkish room and increase the ISO each time until it’s maxed out.  Next, print them and decide what is an acceptable level of noise for printing.

Test the Image Optimization settings in the printer. Print a photo with it turned on and a second with it turned off.  Which do you like better?

If you need to get your feet wet first, try printing some photos at a house party for your friends. It’s a fun way to get some experience under your belt without the pressure of having a job to do. For the hospitable folks out there, why not host a party for that very reason. Besides, once your friends see what you can do, they’re much more inclined to tell other people about you, and that’s how you land a job. As a bonus, anything you buy for the party is a business expense!

For an extra touch of class, print envelopes with the client logo on it. The envelopes will help protect the pictures, as well as serve as an advertising tool for you.

Lessons Learned:
While shooting, just be a photographer. Don’t get bogged down thinking about all the printing stuff. Stay creative and professional.

Distance yourself from the customer while printing; a separate room is ideal.  If you give them a chance to see you working they will invite themselves to look over your shoulder and become your artistic director.

Take extra care to make sure you’re getting good pictures of people.  If someone sees you take a picture of them, they will expect a print.  They will also expect the photo to be in focus, well lit, and a perfect expression on their face.  If any of those factors are missing, take another shot and print the best one.  The guests can lose confidence pretty quickly if they see other photos printed but not theirs.

Both the printer and the ink/paper are available at several local stores.  Try checking out Penn Camera, Staples, Best Buy, or Target and save yourself $50 on overnight shipping.  …yeah, that would’ve been nice to know.

Set DPOF information in the camera as you’re shooting, particularly for those times when you take multiple versions of the same thing.  Pick the best one and set the DPOF.

Don’t forget to pack: a screwdriver (or something comparable) for winding the cartridge/ribbon, power strip and extension cord, USB cable for computer-to-printer, and a memory card reader for the computer.

Create a sign to be displayed with the printed photographs that says:
1.) Prints will be available approximately __ minutes after it was taken.
2.) Please take an envelope to protect your photos.
3.) Re-prints and extra copies (no more than five) can be printed once the current batch is finished.
4.) Photos can be brightened, darkened, cropped, and color-corrected upon request.
5.) Photos can be viewed online at: Pictage.com/123456
6.) All photos have been paid for by: client name
4.) This service is provided by Mud Productions. Visit mudproductions.com
5.) Enjoy!

Assistant:
1.) Use a cell phone headset or 2-way radio to communicate with assistant.
2.) When dropping off a memory card to be printed, let the her know if there are any photos that need to be edited before printing. She will decide if those specific photos should be uploaded or printed first.
3.) Use this Printing Checklist to note which memory cards have been printed and uploaded, and at what time.

Notes:
It takes a little over one minute to print a photo, and if you do the math you should be able to print 100 photos per hour (using two printers).  Practically speaking, it will probably be substantially less than that.  Between the two events I shot, I averaged only 41 prints an hour.  I know there are some things I can do to streamline it further, but I don’t think you could reasonably get more than 65 prints an hour with this setup.

I was able to print DPOF straight from the memory card even while the computer was attached. The instruction manual says not to do this, but I did it on a MacBook and didn’t experience any problems.

Lifespan of printers has not been determined as of this writing. I’ve printed 468 photos between the two printers without a single mishap.

For much bigger jobs, a high-end printer would be preferred though it comes at a price.

Conclusion: On-site printing can be very demanding.  Without a good workflow it’s easy to get overwhelmed.  The guests/customers/attendees will test your patience if you let them.  Make sure you’ve done a few small tests before the shoot and do your best to take everything in stride.  It’s extremely rewarding to hear people comment that they like the photos, but it takes a lot of hard work to get there.

h1

Creative Lighting Without a Flash [Tutorial]

March 13, 2008

The more I study photography the more I realize the importance of lighting. It seems to me that the difference between an exceptional photographer and a decent photographer is that the former has a solid understanding of light. Light defines this visual medium.

Backlight only. White background. No direct light. Directly above. Close. -1EV

Most photographers, myself included, prefer to shoot in natural light, but the downside is that it cannot be controlled. In order to achieve complete creative control over the lighting of your scene, you need to work with other light sources. Anybody who has shopped for lighting equipment is aware that this thing you once called a “hobby” is suddenly a much bigger investment. Good equipment isn’t cheap, but resourcefulness and ingenuity are priceless.

My goal in writing this tutorial is to help you understand the effects of light, how to control it, and how to do it on a non-existent budget. Here’s a look at the tools I used to make it happen. Chances are, you already have this stuff lying around your house somewhere.

  • Lights – I purchased this lamp from IKEA. It cost six dollars. It comes with a clamp for attaching it to a desk, and it uses up to 100W bulb. I have three of them.
  • Reflector – I used a big white envelope (12″ x 12″). You could tape two pieces of printer paper together, or better yet, tape the paper to a piece of cardboard for support. You can also make a reflector out of aluminum foil and cardboard.
  • Foam Core Board – Four pieces from an office supply store (24″ x 32″) two black and two white. I think I paid $4 for them.
  • White Poster – i.e. “big white piece of paper.” I used the back side of a standard wall poster.
  • Tripod – I paid $30 for my tripod. It’s cheap, it’s not built to last, but it’s extremely convenient. (In all honesty, I used my sister’s tripod [$200ish] for this tutorial. It’s faster to work with and a bit more stable, but when it comes to the image you capture it makes absolutely no difference.)

Background Info In order to get creative we first have to know what is considered normal. Three-point lighting is pretty much standard in most visual arts, so we’ll begin our study by taking a brief look at that. It consists of three lights in relation to the subject: key (main) light, fill light, and back light.

Three-point Lighting setup.

Key Light only.  Above, left.Fill Light only.  Above, right.Back Light only.  Above, behind.

Put ‘em all together and what you end up with (below left) is a well-lit shot that comes reasonably close to simulating natural light (below right).

Three-point LightingAll natural light.  Large, north-facing window to the left.

That’s the nutshell version of three-point lighting. There is much more to be said, but it falls outside the scope of this tutorial. Basically, the three lights work together to provide the feel of the scene, to reveal details, and to distinguish your subject.

Similarly, there are three main components or levels to Creative Lighting:

  1. Understanding Shadows
  2. Revealing Details
  3. Capturing Highlights and Reflections

Each one builds off the previous one, so I suggest you start with shadows and work your way down the list. If you prefer, you can view this tutorial in its entirety by following this link.

Be sure to check out the Advanced Techniques, and Lessons Learned.

h1

Creative Lighting: Understanding Shadows

March 13, 2008

This post is part of a larger tutorial called Creative Lighting Without a Flash

The first thing I did was set up my scene. I found it easiest to work with a small card table in the middle of my room. If you have a blank wall, you can shoot against that as your background; otherwise you’ll need to place something behind your subject to give it a solid black or white background. I used the backside of a poster, taped to a piece of foam-core board (as seen below).

Three-point Lighting setup.

By using a single sheet for the wall and the floor it eliminates the seam where the floor meets the wall. Appropriately enough, this technique is called a “seamless” [background]. (Thanks, Mariano!)

The whole idea of creative lighting is to be able to control the light; therefore I recommend that you shoot at night with all the blinds and doors closed. You don’t want any light leaking onto your subject from another source. Be sure to turn off any computer monitors or other unsuspecting sources of light.

The subject you choose to shoot is quite important. For now, pick something simple. We’ll shoot more exciting objects later, but to start you want a subject that’s not too intricate. I used a wooden model, but you could try a vegetable, Willow Tree figurine, or small toy.

For this first exercise, Understanding Shadows, I recommend that you put your camera on Aperture priority. Initially I tried shooting in Manual, but I quickly found that the exposure values can be quite different simply because of the position of the light. Set your ISO as low as it will go –not Auto. You’re camera is already on a tripod, so you don’t need a fast ISO. Put the focus on Manual too. Your setup won’t be changing so there is no reason for the camera to re-focus each time. Affix a lens hood if you have one. Lastly, take your White Balance off of Auto. I mention more about WB later in this tutorial.

Once you have set up your scene and camera the way you like them, it is very important that you do not move your subject or your camera. The best way to observe the effects of different lighting setups is to keep all other factors equal (namely perspective and composition). By keeping your subject and camera in the exact same position you can scroll through the images on your camera’s LCD screen and easily see the differences from one frame to the next. If your perspective changes, it throws everything off and makes it very difficult to learn from what you’re doing.

The following images were taken using only one light. I put the lamp in a different position each time to give the picture a different feel. To simplify things, I never placed the lamp to the left of the camera.

If you hover your mouse over any image you will see a brief description of the light placement. By the way, if you view the photos as a slideshow you will more easily be able to see the differences from one photo to the next. This is especially helpful when the changes are subtle. Look for “slideshow” links throughout this tutorial.

Side-front. Above. Close.Side-front. Level. CloseSide-back. Level. CloseSide. Low. Medium distance.Side. Low. Close.

Side-front. Above. Medium.Straight on. Light directly above the lens.Straight on. Light directly below lens.Side-front. Above. Very close.Above, pointing down. Slightly front. Close.

Directly above, pointing down. CloseAbove, pointing down. Slightly behind. CloseBehind. Above. Slightly right. Close.Side. Low. Mostly bouncing off floor. Close.Side. Low. Completely bounced off floor. Close.

Side. Low. Completely bounced off floor. Close. -1EVFront. Low. Completely bounced off floor. Close. -1EVBehind. Low. Completely bounced off floor. Close. -1EVBehind. Low. Shining on background. No direct light (all bounced). Close. -1EVBehind. Above. Far. Pointed at subject.

Behind. Above. Close. Pointed at subject.Directly above. Close. -1EVMostly above (halo), slightly front. Far. -1EVMostly above (halo), slightly behind. Far. -1EVDirectly behind. Close. -1EV

Above. Far. Shining on background only (no direct light).Directly above. Behind. Close. With pop-up flash.Pop-up flash, only.

Notice how different the photo can feel simply by changing the position of the light. The same wooden model can look like a friendly neighbor saying hi, an angel pointing to Heaven, or a sinister villain ready to attack. The only things I have changed here are the position of the light, and the Exposure Compensation. None of these images have been edited. They all came straight off the camera.

I hope you’re beginning to realize just how much the shadows and lighting can affect the feel of the image. Not only do shadows provide shape and form for the subject, but they direct the audience’s emotional response. A simple change can make a dramatic difference.

Continue to Part II: Revealing Details

h1

Creative Lighting: Revealing Details

March 13, 2008

This post is part of a larger tutorial called Creative Lighting Without a Flash

The second component of creative lighting is revealing the details and textures that make the subject unique. I used a completely different setup for these examples because I wanted to emphasize details rather than just shadows. A piece of fruit, a watch, flower, or tv remote should work well here. Building off what I learned with my wooden model, I started my second series.

I placed an orange on a black piece of foam-core and positioned the light behind the orange. As you can see in the first image (below left) there is virtually no detail visible in the orange. (Why do I keep typing “oranged”?! It’s driving me nuts!) Anyway, instead of positioning another light, thereby complicating the scene, I grabbed a big white envelope to serve as my reflector. I held it between the camera and the orange but just off to the left of the frame. The second image shows the results. This effectively revealed the texture of the orange, but it still seemed a bit flat.

Almost directly behind. No reflector. Almost directly behind. With reflector to the left.

To remedy this I repositioned the light above and slightly behind the orange, and then I fired the third shot (below left). This simple adjustment simultaneously gave me a strong backlight, plenty of texture, and solid shape. I thought the texture could use a little more depth, so I added the reflector and fired the last shot. The orange now has more form, texture, and color.

Above. Behind. No reflector. Above. Behind. With reflector.

Normally I wouldn’t place something like an orange against a black background –it just seems out of place. BUT, think of how different the image would feel if I used a white floor/background. All the light would be reflected back at the orange. After all, my reflector was nothing but a white piece of paper. Think back to the photos of the wooden model. How do you think it would appear if I used a black background instead of white?? Remember that your shooting environment accounts for a lot of the bounced light. Just because you don’t intentionally put a reflector in the scene doesn’t mean there won’t be any reflected light. Try to keep this in mind as you set up your shot.

Next I ate the orange and then placed my watch on the foam-core. The next series of images follows a similar pattern: Shoot a photo, reposition the light, use the reflector as needed. Those are the only things I changed in this next series; it didn’t get any more complicated than that. Again, hover your cursor over an image for a brief description. Click here to view as slideshow.

Directly above. No reflector.Front-left. Above. No reflector.Front-left. Above. With reflector to the right.Behind. Above. Left. No reflector.Behind. Above. Left. With reflector.

Above left.Behind. Right. No reflector.Behind. Right. With reflector.Above. Right. With reflector on left.

Careful attention to detail will easily put your photos a step above most others’. Using a reflector is an excellent way to accent those details. The beautiful thing about a reflector is that it can never be more powerful than the original light source. It’s entirely possible to use a Fill light to reveal details, but just be careful that it doesn’t overpower your Key light. On a random note: watches are almost always photographed with the time reading “10:10.” They say it’s the most aesthetically pleasing time. Go figure.

Continue to Part III: Capturing Highlights and Reflections

h1

Creative Lighting: Capturing Highlights

March 13, 2008

This post is part of a larger tutorial called Creative Lighting Without a Flash

Now we turn our attention to the third and final component of creative lighting: highlights and reflections. Obviously, you will need a reflective or transparent surface like a wine glass, cologne bottle, sunglasses, vase, or kitchen utensils. The tricky part about shooting a subject like this is that you need to define its shape and reveal its details without blowing out the highlights or causing any undesired reflections. It’s a tall order for sure, but once you get the hang of it you will be more attentive to the fine details of an image and your photography will improve because of it.

For the next series, I had a particular image in mind that I wanted to capture. I wanted the image to have a dark feeling overall, yet a rich, regal boldness to it. (These are the sort of useless guidelines you get when someone tries to verbally describe something visual =) That being said, I knew in my head what I wanted, and I set out to capture it. I started with a black floor and background, and a single key light.

Fill/Key Light only.

For starters, the glass looks flat and formless. The wine (which is really just water and red food coloring) looks cloudy and black at the top, and the glass is riddled with ugly reflections and glaring highlights. Clearly a strong key light won’t work, so I turned it off and took another photo using only a backlight shining on the background.

Backlight only. Shining on background (no direct light).

Now we’re getting closer. It’s still a little too dark; there’s not much color in the wine, but at least it’s not suffering from terrible highlights and reflections now. From here, I took a series of images that combined the backlight with the fill light. I had more success in the latter half of the images where I used a reflector to bounce more light at the glass without blowing out the highlights. The last couple images are close to what I wanted, but not quite it. View as slideshow.

Backlight. Fill Light side, level, very close.Backlight. Fill Light behind, level, medium distance.Backlight. Fill Light directly above (halo).Backlight. Fill Light behind, close, level. -1.5EVBacklight. Fill light pointed at subject. Directly above lens.

Backlight. Fill light pointed at subject. Side, level, medium distance.Backlight. Fill light pointed at reflector in front, slightly right, very close.Backlight. Fill light pointed at reflector above, side, right, close.Backlight. Fill light pointed at reflector above, behind, right, far.Backlight. Fill light pointed at reflector right, level, close.

After all this, I decided that the best way to get what I was aiming for was to use a white floor and background. This means that my environment will now work as a reflector, so I shouldn’t even need any fill light. Sure enough, I changed my setup from black (below left) to white (below right), and then captured the following image right away.

Black background setup. White background setup.

Backlight only. White background. No direct light.

I also did a similar shot with a cologne bottle, but this time I wanted to emphasize the importance of White Balance. The only thing that changed in the following images was the WB.

White Balance 2357KWhite Balance 2706KWhite Balance 3191KWhite Balance 4381K

Don’t overlook the importance of color in your photos. Particularly when you’re using desk lamps the Auto WB setting on your camera will likely give the image a yellow-orange tone.

For my final example, I chose to shoot an old hard drive that I dismantled. I was amazed at how reflective the disks were –just like a mirror! I knew this would add another layer of difficulty, so I pulled together everything I knew to capture the following images. View as slideshow.

Key Light above, left, medium distance.Key Light above, almost front, medium distance.Key Light directly above (halo).Key Light directly behind.Key Light bounced off ceiling, front, left. Fill light above, right.

The biggest difference for this one was adding a “ceiling” to the environment. Since the disks were so reflective I was seeing the ceiling of my room in the reflection. The picture below shows that I suspended the second piece of foam-core as a ceiling to ensure that the reflections were smooth and free of distractions.

As you can see, the game changes quite a bit when you start shooting transparent or reflective surfaces. Backlighting no longer produces only a rim of light around your subject, but it can illuminate the body of it. Bounced lighting can do more than simply reveal detail, it can serve as the main light source in the scene.

To sum it up: Shadows provide form and shape to the subject. Fill Light reveals its details and texture. And Highlights bring it to life. All of these aspects are controlled in three-point lighting. What I’ve done here is simply isolate each one and then observe how they all fit together.

Continue to Part IV: Advanced Techniques, and Lessons Learned.

h1

Creative Lighting: Summary

March 13, 2008

This post is part of a larger tutorial called Creative Lighting Without a Flash

Advanced Techniques – If you need a bigger reflector try using a sun visor (like the ones you put in your windshield). Some of them are identical to professional reflectors except that they are designed to fit in a windshield.

Position all three lamps next to each other to create “one” bright, soft light. With the combined intensities you may be able to photograph bigger objects and use a faster shutter speed.

Shoot in context. Instead of using a black piece of foam core board, use a board game as your background and let your subject be the game pieces. Try to create an engaging product shot that would sell or summarize the game. A sharp-looking chess set would be a perfect place to start.

Try lighting something with a screen, for example: a compact camera, iPhone, GPS device, or digital clock. First make sure the screen is displaying something, then see if you can capture a well-lit shot without the screen being washed out. Watch out for glares and reflections.

Lessons Learned – You don’t have to use expensive equipment to achieve stunning results. Creative thinkers with some ingenuity will always be leading the way in the photography industry. Don’t let yourself be stifled by what you don’t have.

The main advantage of working with desk lamps is that you can “see” the light and sculpt it instantly. When using strobes you have to fire a test shot, review it, make adjustments, and then fire another test shot. These little desk lamps, on the other hand, allow you to instantly see how the position of the light is affecting your subject. If possible, reposition the lights while looking through the viewfinder to observe the changes.

Learn how light “works” with little lamps first and you’ll find yourself much less intimidated by more complex lighting equipment.

It’s easiest to compare differences in lighting if the position of the camera and the subject remains unchanged.

Subtle changes can make a huge difference.

Desk lamps don’t put out nearly as much light as a strobe. Because of this, you will most likely be using relatively long exposures; that means you need a tripod and a stationary subject. Also, this means that if you try adding a flash to the mix it will significantly overpower the other lights.

Light intensity diminishes with distance (*quadratically, if you care to know). Therefore the further the lights are from the subject, the less effective they will be. This essentially limits you to shooting very small subjects –probably nothing larger than one cubic foot.

Don’t complicate it by adding every lamp you own. Do as much as you can with a simple setup. A creative thinker once said, “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. “

The most common barrier between a good photographer and an exceptional photographer is the ability to see and capture light.

h1

Macro Waterdrops [tips and tricks]

May 16, 2007

A couple years ago I stumbled across a photo similar to this one. I was blown away at the photographer’s ability to capture the scene so poetically. Like many other ideas that scurry across my brain I filed that mental image in my memory bank and waited for the day when I could pull it out.

Just over a month ago someone told me about the Reverse Lens technique for macro photography. As soon as I realized that I can now do extreme close-ups, I set out to capture that very specific shot. After four days of trying and roughly 510 shots, I finally got it! =)

The rest of this post describes how I got the shot and what I learned along the way. It is my hope that you’ll find it helpful and will be inspired to take some rockin’ pictures yourself!

First, a word to the skeptics: Yes. That is a real picture. I did use Photoshop to adjust the brightness, but other than that the image is untouched. I could show it to you on my camera. If you have any other questions, keep reading. After all, that’s why I’m writing this.

Day 1. It had been raining all morning and slowly came to a stop around lunch time. I grabbed my camera and headed across the street to a patch of pansies. “This will be fun,” I thought. Let’s just say it started to feel like something less than fun as I spent roughly 90 minutes trying to get one shot. …trying unsuccessfully, that is.

I came away with a few variations, but none were quite right. The main problem I encountered is that the pansies were too nondescript. They just looked like a blur of color when refracted in a water drop.

PICT0623PICT0680PICT0610Handle with Care (PICT0620)

Day 2. I decided to use tulips this time since they were a bit more recognizable. It was a bright sunny day, so I brought my fancy “Macro Mist Machine” otherwise known as a spray bottle. I kept spraying the flowers until the water drops collected and were big enough to be photographed. Ideally you want them as big and as perfectly round as possible. The more distorted the shape, the more distorted the refracted image will be.

As I now realize it, the problem with my second attempt was that the tulips weren’t close enough to the water drops. Instead, the image in the drop is more of a landscape view. If you look very closely, you can actually see the Washington Monument in the first picture below.

Also, I discovered (well after the fact) that I was actually zooming in too closely. In some cases I couldn’t even get the entire drop in focus because the Depth of Field (DoF) was too shallow. Zoom out a little; this will increase the sharpness by minimizing the DoF. You can crop the image later if you really want the subject bigger. It’s better to have a smaller subject in focus, than a larger subject out of focus.

Washington MonumentPICT0842Stuck in Serenity (PICT0760)

Day 3. I was definitely getting a bit frustrated at this point. I searched for some photos on Flickr to see how other people had pulled off the shot. Eventually my main problem became apparent: the drops I kept choosing were sitting on top of the petals, rather than hanging from a twig or something. The drops on top of the petals tend to be flatter, and much much harder to shoot from a decent angle. If you haven’t already come to this conclusion, I was lying on the ground at least 90% of the time.

The images I found that “worked” all seemed to have the flower resting on the ground with the water drops slightly elevated so that the photographer could shoot down at them, rather than sideways as I was doing.

To test this theory, I set up some random object around the apartment and tried to get a better feel for the spacing and position of everything. Depending on the size of the object in the background, it needs to be about two inches behind/below the drops. None of the pictures from attempt number three were satisfactory, but I finally felt like I knew what the problem was.

Charlie Brown DropstarDrops

Day 4. Determined to do it right this time, I headed out once more. After trying several variations with some dandelions I finally pulled it off by using a very small yellow flower (aka “weed”) and hanging dew drops on the grass. The last picture below is included to help give you an idea of just how small the scale is. Note the relative size of the nickel in the photo. The flower was placed less than two inches behind the drops, and the drops themselves are perhaps smaller than you would imagine. After taking several photos I sprayed more water on the grass hoping to enlarge the drops without making them too heavy. I snapped some more photos and repeated the process a couple more times before they fell.

There are two main things to glean from my successful attempt. 1.) You really have to slow down and look very intently to find the right shot. 2.) Note that I placed the flower myself –I actually plucked it and then positioned it on the ground. Don’t be afraid to arrange the elements in the scene yourself. Chances are, you will have to be more hands-on than you might be used to if you want to have any success with this.

PICT1166PICT0962cropPICT1252PICT1009PICT1122

Lessons Learned: Practice makes (almost) perfect. I didn’t successfully capture my water drop picture until my fourth trip out. I set out to capture a single image, yet I had to shoot over 500 photos before it happened. It was at times frustrating, “Why! can’t I get it right?” Patience and persistence are key. Don’t expect to get the perfect shot right away –excitement comes much earlier than satisfaction.

Photography takes on a very different and extremely rewarding tone when you set out to capture a specific photo rather than shooting what’s around. It forces you to think of new ideas and ways of doing things. The sooner you stop thinking, “Wait a minute, you’re not supposed to do that!” the sooner you will tap into your creative side and start taking some sweet photographs. Get creative! Think outside the Instruction Manual (let’s be honest, you probably haven’t read that thing anyway =) Ask “What if…” not, “If only…”

Quick Recap:

  • Stick with it. Patience and persistence are key.
  • Use an easily identifiable object for the subject you want to capture inside the drop.
  • Don’t wait for the rain, bring your own! A spray bottle can work wonders.
  • Don’t zoom in too close. The shallow focus becomes a problem the closer you get.
  • Big, round drops produce the least distorted refractions.
  • Hanging drops typically work better than sitting ones.
  • The background object should be about three inches from the water drops.
  • Take control and arrange the scene as necessary.

Now grab a spray bottle and have at it!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.